Hall Payne secures win for maritime officers and marine engineers
Hall Payne Lawyers has secured a great win for members of the Australian Maritime Officers’ Union and the Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers in a recent appeal to a Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission. This relates to an appeal of a decision to reject approval of the ASP Ship Management/RTM Officers Enterprise Agreement 2017 (“the Agreement”).
The unions and the employer reached agreement over the terms of the instrument and applied to the Fair Work Commission to have it approved.
At first instance, the Commission decided that one of the terms of the agreement was discriminatory. It declined to approve the agreement unless the employer provided an undertaking that the discriminatory term be of no effect. The employer gave the undertaking and the agreement was approved.
What was the clause in dispute?
Maritime officers are required to obtain certificates of competency so that the maritime authorities will grant them permission to work. The allegedly discriminatory term related to compensation for loss of certificates of competency.
Hundreds of enterprise agreements in the maritime industry contain clauses which set out a scheme for compensation to be paid according to graded scale: younger officers receive the most compensation (as they have longer to run in their career) and this gradually decreases as they approach retirement age.
The arguments on appeal
Following the Commissioner’s initial decision, our clients sought advice about an appeal.
The principal argument that we advanced on appeal was that the clause was not “age-related” discrimination; therefore, there was no basis to seek the undertaking. Our clients also challenged the undertaking made by the Commissioner on a number of bases.
A Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission accepted all of our arguments, saying the clause:
“does not treat older employees differently because of their age; it treats them differently because of a relevant difference in the period of the seagoing career which has been lost”
The Bench found that the various criticisms of the scheme made by the Commissioner weren’t demonstrative of age discrimination but rather simply describe the scheme which the Commissioner would have preferred.
This was enough to dispose of the appeal. The Full Bench also accepted the unions’ other arguments, finding that the Commissioner had no power to make the undertaking because it went beyond simply remedying the alleged discrimination (which in any event did not exist) and because it imposed a financial detriment on the relevant employees, who would have lost access to this valuable entitlement.
The Agreement is now in operation and the loss of certificate compensation clause is in full effect.
Hall Payne Lawyers are experts at helping unions and their members enforce their rights and access the full extent of their entitlements. If you’ve been denied your workplace rights and entitlements, you should seek advice from your Union or a lawyer experienced in industrial law.
This article relates to Australian law; either at a State or Federal level.
The information contained on this site is for general guidance only. No person should act or refrain from acting on the basis of such information. Appropriate professional advice should be sought based upon your particular circumstances. For further information, please do not hesitate to contact Hall Payne Lawyers.